Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

Worklenz

Open source · OSI-approvedStatus: unknownNew

Open-source project management with tasks, time tracking, and resourcing

Alternative to Jira, Asana

Worklenz is an open-source project-management platform covering task management, time tracking, resource allocation, and reporting in one workspace. Teams plan across list, board, calendar, Gantt, and roadmap views, and deploy it either as a managed cloud or self-hosted from the AGPL-3.0 codebase.[1][2]

Quick verdict

Small teams and agencies that want tasks, time tracking, and resourcing in one open codebase will get the most from Worklenz. The AGPL-3.0 core self-hosts free for unlimited users and the cloud Free tier covers unlimited users on 3 projects, undercutting per-seat SaaS bills. The material constraints are a moderate self-hosting bar (Node, PostgreSQL, S3 storage) and thin independent user-report coverage, so verify support terms and SSO before regulated adoption. If you want managed convenience with zero operations, choose Asana; if you want the same planning workflows with deployment control, choose Worklenz.[1][2][3]

Key features

  • Multi-view task management Tasks plan across list, board, calendar, Gantt, and roadmap views, with customizable workflows and sprint management for delivery teams.[1][2]

  • Built-in time tracking Time tracks against tasks and projects natively, so agency and client billing workflows stay inside the same tool.[1][2]

  • Resource allocation Resource allocation and team utilization views show who is over-committed across projects.[1][2]

  • Insights and reporting Project and member insights plus reporting follow progress without a separate analytics add-on.[1]

  • Real-time collaboration Real-time collaboration keeps distributed teammates on the same task state from any connected device.[1]

  • API access Documented API access supports integrations beyond the built-in feature set.[1]

  • Self-host or cloud choice The same product runs as a managed cloud or self-hosted via Docker or own servers, with a community edition free for unlimited users.[1][2]

  • Free tier without seat tax The cloud Free tier covers unlimited users on up to 3 active projects, and the vendor comparison frames the same core workflows as Asana without a per-seat fee.[1][2]

Who will love it

  • Agencies running client and internal projects: tasks, time tracking, and resourcing live in one system instead of three subscriptions.[1][2]

  • Cost-sensitive small teams that can self-host: the free community edition removes per-seat pricing for unlimited users.[1][2]

  • Teams outgrowing per-seat SaaS bills: the same core planning workflows stay available on flat self-hosted pricing.[1][2]

Limitations to weigh

  • Self-hosting is a moderate operations commitment: Node 18+, PostgreSQL 15+, and S3-compatible storage on Docker or your own servers, not a one-click install.[1][2]

  • Only browser-based Web use is asserted from official sources; native mobile or desktop apps were claimed solely in third-party press and remain unconfirmed.[1]

  • Commercial terms beyond headline plan prices, including support SLAs, SSO, and data-region options, were not documented in the reviewed sources and need verification before regulated adoption.[1]

What the reports suggest

Two inspected third-party items: a MacSources hands-on review reporting an intuitive, uncluttered setup (team account, then projects) and a Munich Eye Worklenz 2.0 report covering pricing and self-hosting requirements. No exact excerpts reused.

2 cited community sources. Small third-party sample: one hands-on review and one version-launch press piece; no Reddit or G2 user-report sample was inspected, and enterprise or long-term self-hosting experiences are unrepresented.

A hands-on reviewer found Worklenz intuitive and uncluttered for both seasoned and new project managers, with setup flowing from team account to projects.[1]

Version-launch press corroborates the core facts used here: the Jira-alternative positioning, the sub-$500 self-hosted commercials, and the Node/PostgreSQL/S3 self-hosting bar.[1]

The inspected third-party sample is thin: one review and one launch report, with no Reddit or G2 user-report sample, so day-to-day reliability and support quality are unverified by independent users.[1][2]

Alternatives and compatibility

Asana wins on zero-operations managed convenience for non-technical teams; Worklenz fits where the same planning workflows are wanted without per-seat pricing or with data under your own control.[1]

Jira wins on deep enterprise process machinery; Worklenz fits teams that want sprint and issue workflows with less configuration overhead.[1][2]

Stay when tasks, time tracking, resourcing, and deployment choice all matter in one open codebase; switch toward an incumbent when a specific integration, compliance certification, or support SLA exists only there.[1][2]

Questions worth asking

What is the best Worklenz alternative for non-technical users?

Asana, the incumbent in this catalogue relationship, suits non-technical teams that want managed work coordination without operating infrastructure; Worklenz fits once the team accepts browser-based tooling and possibly self-hosting.[1][2]

Can a non-technical team run Worklenz?

Mostly no: task boards, time tracking, resourcing, and reporting are point-and-click, but self-hosting needs Node.js, PostgreSQL, and S3-compatible storage administration. Teams without that capacity should use the managed cloud instead.[1][2]

How much does Worklenz cost per month?

The cloud Free tier costs nothing for unlimited users on up to 3 active projects; paid cloud plans are $9.99 and $14.99 per user per month. Self-hosting ranges from a free community edition to $99/month Business and $499/month Enterprise.[1]

Can I self-host Worklenz?

Yes. A community edition self-hosts free for unlimited users via Docker or your own servers (Node 18+, PostgreSQL 15+, S3-compatible storage), and paid Business and Enterprise self-hosted plans add commercial terms.[1][2][3]

Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 13, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

Two inspected third-party items: a MacSources hands-on review reporting an intuitive, uncluttered setup (team account, then projects) and a Munich Eye Worklenz 2.0 report covering pricing and self-hosting requirements. No exact excerpts reused. Small third-party sample: one hands-on review and one version-launch press piece; no Reddit or G2 user-report sample was inspected, and enterprise or long-term self-hosting experiences are unrepresented.

  1. Worklenz homepage (official)

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official homepage: open-source positioning, team tagline, core features, views, self-hosted community edition plus cloud, any-device browser access.

  2. Worklenz GitHub repository README (vendor-published)

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Vendor-published README: Jira/Asana-alternative positioning, feature list, AGPL-3.0 license, Angular/TypeScript stack, Docker and one-click installs, 2025-2026 releases.

  3. Worklenz vs Asana comparison (official)

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Vendor-published comparison: Worklenz against Asana over the same core project-management workflows without a per-seat fee.

  4. Worklenz pricing via official comparison page

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official pricing figures: AGPL-3.0 statement, cloud Free/Pro/Business tiers, self-hosted Community/Business/Enterprise tiers.

  5. Worklenz 2.0 press coverage (The Munich Eye)

    community · Observed October 13, 2026

    Independent version-launch report: free-Jira-alternative framing, self-hosted and cloud pricing, Node/PostgreSQL/S3 requirements, mobile and desktop app claims.

  6. Worklenz hands-on review (MacSources)

    community · Observed October 13, 2026

    Independent hands-on review: intuitive uncluttered interface, team-then-project setup, self-hosted data-control note.

Compared with these products

Similar projects

Related projects with shared categories, technologies, or licensing.

OpenProject

OpenProjectOpen

Open-source project management with Gantt charts and agile boards

Stars16.4K
Commitjust now
LicenseGPL-3.0

OpenProject is a GPL-licensed, open-source project management platform for classic, agile, or hybrid teams, with Gantt scheduling, boards, issue tracking, and time reporting.

Solidtime

SolidtimeOpen

Open-source time tracking for freelancers and agencies

Stars8,995
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Solidtime is an open-source time tracker for freelancers and agencies with timers, timesheets, projects, clients, billable rates, and Docker self-hosting.

Ever Gauzy

Ever GauzyOpen

Open-source ERP, CRM, HRM, and project platform with time tracking

Stars8,184
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Ever Gauzy is an open-source business management platform combining ERP, CRM, HRM, project management, and time tracking in one self-hostable TypeScript system.

Redmine

Redmine

Self-hosted project management with issue tracking and Gantt charts

Stars6,044
Commitjust now
LicenseGPL-2.0

Redmine is a GPL-2.0 licensed, self-hosted project management web app built on Ruby on Rails, with issue tracking, Gantt charts, time logging, and multi-project support.

Vikunja

Vikunja

The to-do app to organize your life

Stars5,713
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0-only

Vikunja is an AGPLv3-licensed open-source to-do and task manager that organizes work in lists, Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and tables, self-hosted with Docker or native binaries or used as paid EU-hosted Vikunja Cloud, with one-click-style importers from Trello, Todoist, and Microsoft To-Do.

Kimai

KimaiOpen

Open-source time tracking with timesheets, reports, and invoices

Stars5,067
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Kimai is a free open-source time tracker for freelancers, agencies, and companies that combines timers, calendar timesheets, and invoice generation in one web application.