Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

Asana alternatives

6 projects to consider for your Asana workflows.

2 open source · 4 custom license

Explore Focalboard, Ever Teams and Fizzy. Each takes a different approach to your Asana workflows. Read its capabilities and limitations to find the right fit.

Catalogue facts checked August 31, 2026

Focalboard

Project boards that work offline and stay local

Open sourceMITSelf-hosted

Individuals and self-hosting teams that want Trello-style boards without a subscription get the most from Focalboard: its offline desktop edition plans against local files with no account, and the server edition shares boards from your own infrastructure. The decisive constraint is maintenance: the standalone repository describes itself as currently unmaintained and seeking a maintainer, so teams needing a supported roadmap should choose a hosted incumbent such as Notion or Asana, and adopters should treat the MIT codebase as self-owned.[1]

Good fit. Individuals who plan offline: the desktop edition runs fully local with no account, fitting work on machines that cannot talk to a SaaS product.[1]

Keep in mind. Teams needing a maintained roadmap with support: the standalone repository describes itself as currently not maintained and seeking a maintainer, so anyone buying into future development should look elsewhere.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed August 31, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. Focalboard repository README (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official repository README: open source multilingual self-hosted positioning as a Trello/Notion/Asana alternative; Personal Desktop single-user macOS/Windows/Linux and Personal Server self-hosted editions; standalone repo currently not maintained and seeking a maintainer; Mattermost Boards plugin in a separate repository; Boards API docs.

Ever Teams

Open-source time tracking and team management platform

Custom licenseAGPL-3.0-onlySelf-hostedManaged hosting

Remote teams logging billable hours and agencies turning tracked time into invoices will get the most from Ever Teams. Its desktop and mobile timers, kanban boards, budgets, cost reports, and invoicing cover the full track-to-bill workflow, with Docker or Kubernetes self-hosting and offline recording for infrastructure-owning teams. The price of that depth is operational and licensing homework: self-hosting is a multi-service stack, exact cloud tier figures and SSO scope stayed unverified in extraction, and multi-edition licensing needs confirmation. If you can operate Docker or pay per-employee cloud pricing and accept AGPL-3.0 for the core, choose Ever Teams; if you need zero infrastructure ownership with simple flat pricing, choose a simpler hosted tracker.[1][2]

Good fit. Remote teams tracking billable time: desktop and mobile timers plus cost reports match distributed teams logging hours daily.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Teams with nobody to operate servers: self-hosting is a multi-service Docker or Kubernetes stack of moderate difficulty, so pure no-ops teams should use the managed cloud instead.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 5, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. Ever Teams - pricing

    official · Observed October 5, 2026

    Official pricing page: hosted trial plus per-employee monthly cloud plans with tiered features including tasks, time tracking, reporting, REST API access, SSO, and support; tier-to-feature mapping partly unclear in extraction.

  2. ever-co/ever-teams README

    official · Observed October 5, 2026

    Repository README: open work and productivity platform, web/desktop/mobile apps, time tracking, kanban tasks, projects, scheduling, attendance, budgets, invoices, named integrations, Docker/Kubernetes self-hosting, offline recording, AGPL-3.0.

Fizzy

Free kanban boards from 37signals, hosted or self-hosted

Custom licenseO'SaasySelf-hostedManaged hosting

Fizzy fits small teams that want a calm, minimal kanban board without per-seat fees. Its concrete advantage is documented simplicity plus a real self-hosting path: free hosted accounts, or the ONCE installer, Docker image, or Kamal on your own server. Its material constraint is scope: no card dependencies, no card numbering, and no built-in analytics, so complex programs will outgrow it. If your work fits on cards with steps, assignments, and due dates, choose Fizzy; if you need dependencies and portfolio reporting, choose Trello or Asana.[1][2][3]

Good fit. If issue trackers feel like administration rather than work, Fizzy's boards, steps, and due dates cover the essentials without the ceremony.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Without card-to-card dependencies or linked cards, scheduling chains of blocked work has no native support.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 5, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

One inspected firsthand press setup-and-use report (ItsFoss, self-hosted Cloudron install). No Reddit or G2 sample was accessible. One inspected firsthand press report only; no accessible Reddit threads or G2 reviews, so no independent user quotations are carried and nothing about reliability at scale can be inferred.

  1. Fizzy, by 37signals

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official product site inspected October 2026. Establishes 37signals authorship, kanban positioning, do-one-thing-well philosophy, and free-for-everyone hosted accounts.

  2. basecamp/fizzy repository

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Public repository inspected October 2026, including the full README feature list, self-hosting documentation (ONCE installer, Docker image, Kamal), and the O'Saasy license terms.

  3. We Ditched ClickUp for Fizzy (ItsFoss hands-on)

    community · Observed October 9, 2026

    Firsthand setup-and-use report inspected October 2026. Self-hosted on Cloudron in about ten minutes; praised minimal UI, calendar view, group-by, import/export, and permissions; noted missing card numbering, dependencies, and built-in analytics. One report: an anecdote, not a consensus.

Leantime

Goals-focused open-source project management for non-project managers

Custom licenseAGPL-3.0-onlySelf-hostedManaged hosting

Small teams led by non-project managers will get the most from Leantime. Its boards, sprints, goal tracking, timesheets, wikis, and retrospectives cover the full plan-to-delivery loop in one self-hostable package. The price of that breadth on a PHP and MySQL stack is operational responsibility, so teams with zero server capacity and no budget should choose a managed incumbent instead. If you can run the Community Edition or pay $10 per user per month for hosted Pro, choose Leantime; if you need hands-off simplicity at zero ops, start with Trello.[1][2][3]

Good fit. Goal-linked boards and plain-language workflows replace Jira-style administration with planning the whole team can read.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Self-hosting needs PHP 8.2+, MySQL 8 or MariaDB, a web server, and upgrade discipline; without that, only the paid Pro plan fits.[1][2]

Repository review signals: unknown status, stale · Observed October 11, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 11, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

Inspected sample: two text G2 reviews (one Small-Business, one Mid-Market) plus one textless Small-Business rating, observed October 2026. Only three G2 reviews exist and two carry text; no suitable Reddit report was found. Vendor and affiliate content was excluded. No prevalence or satisfaction claim is made.

  1. Leantime: Open Source Project Management Software

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    Official homepage; non-PM positioning, neurodivergent design, GitHub repo, API docs, plugin marketplace, mobile beta

  2. Leantime Pricing: Flexible Plans

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    Official pricing; Pro $10/user/month monthly or $8 annually, 14-day trial, Community Edition AGPLv3 self-hosted, no free SaaS

  3. Leantime/leantime repository README and composer manifest

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    Repository identity; AGPL-3.0-only manifest, full OSS feature matrix, PHP 8.2 and MySQL 8 requirements, Docker image

  4. Leantime Reviews on G2

    community · Observed October 11, 2026

    G2 product page; 5.0 rating from 3 reviews with two text firsthand reports, inspected October 2026

Manage

Open-source project management with tasks, docs, and time tracking

Custom licenseAGPL-3.0-onlySelf-hosted

Small product teams that want tasks, docs, and time tracking in one self-hosted workspace benefit most from Manage. Its concrete advantage is breadth without cost: task boards, MDX docs, calendars, custom fields, and billable time tracking arrive in a single AGPL codebase. The material constraint is operational and legal: you host and maintain it yourself, and the AGPL copyleft governs network use and derivatives. If your team can self-host and accept copyleft, try Manage; if you need a vendor-operated service with support, choose a managed incumbent such as Asana.[1][2][3]

Good fit. Teams splitting tasks, docs, and hours across subscriptions benefit from one codebase covering all three without license fees.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Teams needing a vendor-operated service should look elsewhere, since hosting, upgrades, backups, and mail delivery remain the operator's job.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, stale · Observed October 11, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 11, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. Manage - Modern project management

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    Official product site observed October 2026. Supports identity, feature set, free and open-source positioning, and the repository link. The live application preview requires sign-in, so hosted-candidate details are limited to public pages.

  2. techulus/manage README

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    Repository README observed October 2026. Supports repository identity, feature list, self-hosting requirements and methods, version v0.5.0-beta, and auth/storage dependencies.

  3. techulus/manage LICENSE (AGPL-3.0)

    official · Observed October 11, 2026

    LICENSE file observed October 2026. Supports the AGPL-3.0-only license claim and the absence of separate commercial terms in the repository.

Worklenz

Open-source project management with tasks, time tracking, and resourcing

Open sourceAGPL-3.0Self-hostedManaged hosting

Small teams and agencies that want tasks, time tracking, and resourcing in one open codebase will get the most from Worklenz. The AGPL-3.0 core self-hosts free for unlimited users and the cloud Free tier covers unlimited users on 3 projects, undercutting per-seat SaaS bills. The material constraints are a moderate self-hosting bar (Node, PostgreSQL, S3 storage) and thin independent user-report coverage, so verify support terms and SSO before regulated adoption. If you want managed convenience with zero operations, choose Asana; if you want the same planning workflows with deployment control, choose Worklenz.[1][2][3]

Good fit. Agencies running client and internal projects: tasks, time tracking, and resourcing live in one system instead of three subscriptions.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Self-hosting is a moderate operations commitment: Node 18+, PostgreSQL 15+, and S3-compatible storage on Docker or your own servers, not a one-click install.[1][2]

Repository review signals: unknown status, stale · Observed October 13, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 13, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

Two inspected third-party items: a MacSources hands-on review reporting an intuitive, uncluttered setup (team account, then projects) and a Munich Eye Worklenz 2.0 report covering pricing and self-hosting requirements. No exact excerpts reused. Small third-party sample: one hands-on review and one version-launch press piece; no Reddit or G2 user-report sample was inspected, and enterprise or long-term self-hosting experiences are unrepresented.

  1. Worklenz homepage (official)

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official homepage: open-source positioning, team tagline, core features, views, self-hosted community edition plus cloud, any-device browser access.

  2. Worklenz GitHub repository README (vendor-published)

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Vendor-published README: Jira/Asana-alternative positioning, feature list, AGPL-3.0 license, Angular/TypeScript stack, Docker and one-click installs, 2025-2026 releases.

  3. Worklenz pricing via official comparison page

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official pricing figures: AGPL-3.0 statement, cloud Free/Pro/Business tiers, self-hosted Community/Business/Enterprise tiers.

  4. Worklenz 2.0 press coverage (The Munich Eye)

    community · Observed October 13, 2026

    Independent version-launch report: free-Jira-alternative framing, self-hosted and cloud pricing, Node/PostgreSQL/S3 requirements, mobile and desktop app claims.

  5. Worklenz hands-on review (MacSources)

    community · Observed October 13, 2026

    Independent hands-on review: intuitive uncluttered interface, team-then-project setup, self-hosted data-control note.

Compare Asana alternatives

Known catalogue facts at a glance. Columns with no reviewed values are omitted. “Not reviewed” means unknown, not that a capability is absent.

Known facts for Asana alternatives
ProjectLicense policyHostingDeploymentOfflineEnterprise supportBest fit
FocalboardMIT · OSI-approvedSelf-hostedNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewed
Ever TeamsAGPL-3.0-only · customSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateYesNot reviewedRemote teams tracking billable time; Agencies costing projects and invoicing clients
FizzyO'Saasy · customSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedNot reviewedKanban task tracking; Team project boards
LeantimeAGPL-3.0-only · customSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedNot reviewedSmall teams led by non-project managers needing goals-connected planning; Startups and agencies wanting Jira-class breadth without administrator overhead
ManageAGPL-3.0-only · customSelf-hostedmoderateNot reviewedNot reviewedSmall product teams that want tasks, docs, and time tracking in one tool; Teams that must self-host project data on their own infrastructure
WorklenzAGPL-3.0 · OSI-approvedSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedYesAgencies managing client and internal projects; Small teams needing tasks, time tracking, and resourcing in one tool

Before you switch

  • Check that the project covers the workflows and data you need to move.
  • Confirm that the license terms fit how you plan to run, modify, and distribute it.
  • Choose between self-hosting responsibility and a reviewed managed option.
  • Open the project page for repository freshness, review dates, and any unresolved requirements.
About Asana

Asana is aimed at the coordination work around delivery rather than at engineering tickets: campaigns, launches, onboarding, and the dependencies between them. Timeline and workload views are the parts teams adopt first.

It reads more naturally to non-technical teams than an engineering tracker does, at the cost of being weaker for anything that needs to sit next to a code repository.

Asana · Free for up to 10 users, paid from $10.99/user/month · Checked August 31, 2026

Official website
How this list is ordered

Recommended · Organic catalogue order.

A deterministic editorial score using relationship confidence, category fit, logarithmic popularity, as-of maintenance and freshness, with bounded anomaly quarantine and known-data penalties. Payment is fixed at zero.

Payment does not affect organic ranking. Order is a starting point, not a universal recommendation.

OpenAlternative organic alternatives v4 · version 4

Alternatives to Asana: Open Source and More | OpenSourceAlternatives