Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

Wraft

Open source · OSI-approvedStatus: unknownNew

Open-source document lifecycle management with built-in e-signature

Alternative to DocuSign

Wraft is an open-source Document Lifecycle Management platform from Functionary Labs that covers business documents from drafting and review to signature and storage. Its repository, wraft/wraft, is licensed under AGPLv3, and the official site confirms the platform is fully self-hostable. The product is currently in private beta.[1][2]

Quick verdict

Wraft is a self-hostable open-source platform for authoring, approving, and signing business documents, aimed at teams that want the contract workflow without a per-envelope SaaS. It is in private beta under AGPLv3, so early adopters trade maturity and support guarantees for control.[1][2]

Capabilities

  • Documents are signed inside Wraft with built-in e-signature and approval workflows, so signing happens where the document was authored.[1]

  • Contracts and proposals are generated automatically from the platform rather than assembled by hand each time.[1]

  • The full platform runs on your own servers: the site FAQ confirms self-hosting and the repository ships Docker and compose artifacts.[1][2]

  • Integration options include REST APIs, Single Sign-On (SSO), and webhooks for connecting Wraft to surrounding tooling.[1]

  • Markdown documents convert to PDF through Pandoc, with LaTeX and Typst template support for controlled output.[1]

Good fit

  • Legal and operations teams that produce contracts and proposals and want authoring, review, and signing in one system.[1]

  • Organizations that must keep agreement documents on their own infrastructure instead of a third-party signing cloud.[1][2]

  • Teams sending enough agreements that per-envelope SaaS pricing stings, since self-hosted Wraft carries no per-signature fee.[1]

Limitations

  • Wraft is in private beta, so availability is gated and the product is still maturing toward general release.[1]

  • No pricing page was found in the inspected official sources, so future managed or supported costs cannot be compared yet.[1]

  • No support plan or SLA statement was found in the inspected official sources, which matters for teams needing guaranteed help.[1][2]

  • Self-hosting means running the documented Docker-based deployment yourself, which suits teams with infrastructure capacity.[1]

Compatibility

Self-hosted deployment uses the shipped Dockerfile and docker-compose artifacts to run Wraft on your own servers.[1]

The platform connects to surrounding systems through REST APIs, Single Sign-On (SSO), and webhooks.[1]

Wraft is a web platform with a separate web frontend, fitting teams that work primarily in the browser.[1][2]

Questions worth asking

Is Wraft self-hostable?

Yes. The official site FAQ states Wraft is fully self-hostable under AGPLv3 licensing, and the repository ships Docker and compose artifacts plus self-hosting guidance.[1]

Does Wraft handle e-signatures?

Yes. The official site describes built-in e-signature and approval workflows that get documents signed quickly, alongside automatic contract and proposal generation.[1]

How does Wraft integrate with other tools?

The official site lists REST APIs, Single Sign-On (SSO), and webhooks as integration options, with documentation for developers deploying and connecting the platform.[1]

Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 13, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. Wraft official site

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official product site: positioning, signing and automation claims, self-hosting and AGPLv3 FAQ, integration options, private beta status.

  2. wraft/wraft repository

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official source repository: platform description, AGPL-3.0 license statement, self-hosting guidance, Docker artifacts, topic taxonomy.

  3. Wraft documentation

    official · Observed October 13, 2026

    Official documentation: getting started, deployment, and architecture guides for running the platform.

Compared with these products

Similar projects

Related projects with shared categories, technologies, or licensing.

DocuSeal

DocuSealOpen

Open-source document signing with self-hosting and a signing API

Stars18.7K
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0

DocuSeal is an open-source electronic signature platform for creating PDF forms, sending signature requests, and collecting binding signatures online.

Documenso

DocumensoOpen

Document signing you can host and audit yourself

Stars12.5K
Commit3d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Documenso handles electronic signature collection with the signing certificate, audit trail, and field placement you expect, while keeping the documents on infrastructure you control.

OpenSign

OpenSignOpen

Free, open-source e-signature platform

Stars7,086
Commit10d ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0

OpenSign is a free, open-source e-signature platform and DocuSign alternative with unlimited free-plan signatures, self-hosting, and a managed cloud.

Silex

SilexOpen

Free open-source visual builder for static websites

Stars3,001
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Silex is a free, open-source visual website builder that turns drag-and-drop designs into static HTML sites with dynamic CMS content.

Padloc

PadlocOpen

Open-source E2E-encrypted password manager for people and teams

Stars2,929
Commit1y ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0

Padloc is an open-source, end-to-end encrypted password manager for Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android, and major browsers. It stores passwords, credit cards, notes, documents, and license keys in encrypted vaults that sync through the Padloc cloud, which cannot read them. It serves individuals, families, and teams that want transparent, audited credential management with secure sharing.

mCaptcha

mCaptchaOpen

Privacy-focused proof-of-work CAPTCHA with no tracking or puzzles

Stars2,492
Commit11mo ago
LicenseAGPL-3.0

mCaptcha is a free, self-hosted CAPTCHA that protects websites and forms with proof-of-work challenges instead of image puzzles or visitor tracking.