Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

OpenLIT

Open source · OSI-approvedStatus: unknownNew

Open-source OpenTelemetry observability for LLM apps and AI agents

OpenLIT is an open-source observability platform for LLM applications and AI agents. It traces model calls, tool use, and retrieval over OpenTelemetry, then adds evals, guardrails, and prompt management on top of that telemetry. It runs self-hosted under Apache 2.0, which makes it a fit for teams that must keep trace data on their own infrastructure.[1][2]

Quick verdict

Teams that already export OpenTelemetry and need to see what their AI agents do in production benefit most from OpenLIT. Its strength is the combination of OTel-native tracing with evals, guardrails, and prompt tooling in one self-hosted package. Teams that want managed hosting or a no-code setup should choose something else, because OpenLIT Cloud is still waitlisted and running the stack takes operator effort. If you can run Docker or Kubernetes and your agents speak OTel, OpenLIT is a strong pick; if you cannot, a managed observability platform fits better.[1][2][3]

Key features

  • OpenTelemetry-native trace pipeline SDKs send OTLP to a built-in receiver on ports 4317 and 4318, traces land in ClickHouse, and the UI reads from there. No separate OpenTelemetry Collector is required.[1][2]

  • Python, JavaScript, and Go SDKs Install with pip, npm, or go get, then call openlit.init with an OTLP endpoint to instrument an application. Auto-instrumentation covers LLMs, vector databases, MCP, and frameworks by default.[1][2]

  • Zero-code paths for agents and clusters A CLI installed through Homebrew observes coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and Windsurf without SDK changes, tracking sessions, cost, tokens, and repository activity. An eBPF controller and a GPU collector cover Kubernetes, Docker, and Linux hosts.[1][2]

  • Fifty-six plus integrations Documented coverage spans LLM providers, agent frameworks including LangGraph, CrewAI, the OpenAI Agents SDK, and deepagents, plus vector databases and GPUs. Any OTel source, including OpenLLMetry, can also point OTLP exporters at OpenLIT.[1]

  • Evals on traces or in CI LLM-as-a-judge and programmatic evals score quality, safety, and cost online against production traces or offline through the SDK as CI gates. Regression evals verify fixes to prompts, tools, rules, or guardrails.[1][2]

  • Guardrails and content controls Built-in guards detect prompt injection, jailbreaks, and sensitive topics, and the SDK can redact PII before prompts are sent and recorded. Prompt and completion capture is on by default and can be disabled or truncated per configuration. One documented boundary: the guard rewrite currently reaches single-message prompts only, so multi-turn conversations need additional handling.[1][2]

  • Prompt Hub, Vault, and OpenGround Prompt Hub versions prompts with dynamic variables, API retrieval with unlimited fetching, and AI-assisted improvement. Vault stores LLM API keys encrypted with AES-256-GCM behind key and tag based retrieval. OpenGround compares models side by side on latency, tokens, and cost with your own keys. Custom ClickHouse-backed dashboards with import and export round out the operations tooling.[1]

  • Self-hosted operations Deploy with Docker Compose or Kubernetes Helm, reuse an existing ClickHouse instead of deploying a new one, and sign in with Google, Azure AD, or GitHub. OSS usage is unlimited because you run the infrastructure yourself, with community support on GitHub.[1][2]

Who will love it

  • Platform teams standardizing on OpenTelemetry: if agents, services, and infrastructure already export OTLP, OpenLIT slots into that pipeline and keeps agent telemetry next to the rest of the stack, which matters because a second proprietary agent would split debugging across two systems.[1][2]

  • Organizations with data-residency requirements: self-hosting under Apache 2.0 keeps traces, prompts, and eval data inside operator infrastructure with no per-trace fee, which matters for teams that cannot send prompts and completions to a vendor Cloud.[1][2]

  • Engineers iterating on agent quality: teams that tune prompts, tools, and guardrails get tracing, evals, and prompt versioning in one loop instead of three separate tools, which matters because the eval scores read directly off the same traces used for debugging.[1][2]

Who should avoid it

  • Teams without operator capacity: if nobody can run Docker or Kubernetes plus ClickHouse, the self-hosted requirement is a real burden while the managed Cloud remains waitlisted, so these teams should wait for Cloud pricing or pick a hosted platform.[1][2]

  • Non-technical users seeking no-code tooling: instrumentation needs code or CLI setup, and value comes from reading traces and configuring evals, not from a point-and-click analytics product, so business users without engineers will stall at setup.[1][2]

  • Buyers needing committed support terms: the documented support path is the community on GitHub, with no enterprise SLA stated in the reviewed sources, so regulated procurements that require a named engineer and response times cannot close on the OSS plan alone.[1]

Questions worth asking

What is the best OpenLIT alternative for non-technical users?

A managed observability platform with hosted onboarding fits non-technical users better. OpenLIT assumes an engineer who can deploy containers and read traces, so teams without one should prefer a vendor that runs the infrastructure for them. Since OpenLIT Cloud itself is still waitlisted, that choice means looking outside OpenLIT for now.[1][2]

Is OpenLIT really no-code?

No. Application instrumentation means adding an SDK and an init call in code, and the CLI path still assumes comfort with terminals and agents. Dashboards and prompt management have a UI, but setup and analysis are developer tasks.[1][2]

How much does OpenLIT cost per month?

The software costs nothing per month: the OSS plan is free under Apache 2.0 with unlimited self-hosted usage, as checked on October 12, 2026. You still pay for your own servers and ClickHouse hosting, and Cloud pricing is unannounced while the managed plan stays on a waitlist.[1]

Can you self-host OpenLIT?

Yes. Self-hosting is the primary documented path: Docker Compose or Kubernetes Helm deploys the OpenLIT container plus ClickHouse, an existing ClickHouse can be reused, and no license key is needed. The Apache 2.0 license permits modifying and running the code on your own infrastructure.[1][2][3]

Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 12, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. OpenLIT homepage

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    Official homepage positioning, SDK/CLI/GPU instrumentation paths, integration count, and license statement.

  2. OpenLIT pricing

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    Official plan structure, OSS entitlements, OAuth sign-in, support path, and Cloud waitlist status.

  3. OpenLIT quickstart docs

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    SDK install, OTLP endpoint configuration, content-capture defaults, guard options, and ClickHouse storage flow.

  4. OpenLIT self-host docs

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    Self-host components, ports, Docker/Kubernetes paths, ClickHouse reuse, and no-collector architecture.

  5. openlit/openlit repository

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    Canonical repository identity backing the documented clone-and-deploy flow.

  6. openlit/openlit LICENSE

    official · Observed October 12, 2026

    Repository license text establishing the Apache-2.0 license fact.

Compared with these products

No explicit proprietary baseline is recorded.

Similar projects

Related projects with shared categories, technologies, or licensing.

LangWatch

LangWatchAIOpen

Open-source agent observability, evals, and AI governance

Stars4,937
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0

LangWatch is an open-source observability and evaluation platform for AI platform teams, covering LLM operations, coding-assistant usage, AI gateway routing, and AI governance in one place.

Langfuse

LangfuseAIOpen

Open-source LLM observability, evals, and prompt management

Stars35.3K
Commitjust now
LicenseMIT

Langfuse is an open-source platform for tracing, evaluating, and improving LLM applications and AI agents, with prompt management and experiments built in.

Logfire

LogfireAIOpen

AI-native observability from the Pydantic team, joining LLM calls with telemetry

Stars4,511
Commitjust now
LicenseMIT

Logfire is Pydantic's AI-native observability platform for debugging AI applications in production, built on OpenTelemetry so one timeline covers agent model calls, tools, services, databases, and hosts.

Laminar

LaminarAIOpen

Open-source tracing, evals, and observability for AI agents

Stars3,373
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0

Laminar is an open-source observability platform purpose-built for AI agents, with OpenTelemetry-native tracing, evaluations, and behavior monitoring built in.

Arize Phoenix

Arize PhoenixAI

Open-source tracing, evals, and prompt tools for LLM apps

Stars11.7K
Commitjust now
LicenseElastic-2.0

Arize Phoenix is a self-hosted observability platform for LLM apps with tracing, evaluations, datasets, and a prompt playground.

OpenLLMetry

OpenLLMetryAIOpen

Open-source OpenTelemetry instrumentation for LLM applications

Stars7,484
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0

OpenLLMetry is an open-source observability library that instruments LLM applications with OpenTelemetry traces covering model calls, tool use, and retrieval steps.