Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

Dokku

Open source · OSI-approvedStatus: unknownNew

Self-hosted PaaS that deploys apps with a git push

Dokku is a free, self-hostable platform that turns your own server into a small Heroku. It presents itself as the smallest PaaS implementation you have ever seen: push code with git, let it build and run in isolated Docker containers, and manage apps from one tool on infrastructure you control.[1]

Quick verdict

Developers who want Heroku-style deploys on servers they own benefit most from Dokku. Its concrete strength is free single-host git-push shipping with buildpacks or Dockerfiles, official datastore and domain plugins, and zero-downtime checks from one CLI. The material constraint is operational ownership: one host, CLI-first free tier, and backups and certificates that stay your job. If you want a free mini-Heroku on a VPS you administer, choose Dokku; if you need multi-node clustering or a free built-in dashboard, choose a different PaaS or budget for Dokku Pro.[1][2][3][4]

Key features

  • Git-push Heroku workflow Deploy with a plain git push to Dokku, the same motion Heroku taught: Dokku builds the release and runs it on your server without a separate pipeline.[1]

  • Buildpacks and Dockerfiles Build from Heroku-compatible buildpacks or your own Dockerfile per app, so existing Heroku-style projects migrate without re-architecting the build.[1][2]

  • Official datastore plugins Add Postgres, MySQL, Redis, and more as official plugins with create, link, backup-export, and backup-import commands scoped per app.[1]

  • Domains with automatic TLS Attach custom domains through the domains plugin and issue certificates through the built-in LetsEncrypt integration.[1]

  • Zero-downtime deploys Ship new releases without dropping traffic: configurable checks, retries, timeouts, and waits gate each deploy before it takes over.[1]

  • Backups and recovery Schedule datastore backups with cron-style config, authenticate to remote storage, and restore with matching import commands when something breaks.[1]

  • CLI control plane Operate everything from one command line: Dokku advertises app management, plugins, and datastore commands through a single documented CLI.[1]

  • Pro dashboard and team controls Dokku Pro adds a web UI on your servers with preview environments, cron, OpenSearch logs, and role-based access for teams that outgrow CLI-only work.[1]

Who will love it

  • Heroku-style solo builders Developers who like the Heroku motion but want the bill and the servers under their control get git-push deploys on a VPS they own.[1][2]

  • CLI-first Docker operators Operators comfortable with Docker, domains, and cron get a composable single-host PaaS where every capability is a documented command.[1][2]

  • Cost-sensitive self-hosters Small teams that want a free open-source core with an optional paid UI upgrade on the same servers get both editions from the same vendor.[1][2]

Who should avoid it

  • Single-host scope The migration guide positions Dokku for a single host rather than multi-node clustering, which matters once traffic or redundancy needs outgrow one box.[1]

  • Dashboard only in paid Pro The open-source edition is CLI-first: the web UI, previews, and role-based controls arrive with Dokku Pro Team or Scale, not the free core.[1]

  • Operator-owned production readiness Backup schedules, storage auth, certificate renewal, and OS updates stay your job, so production calm depends on operator discipline rather than a vendor runbook.[1]

What the reports suggest

Evidence inspected October 2026: official Dokku homepage and plugin docs, the Dokku Pro page, one Qovery Heroku-migration guide covering Dokku, and the G2 Dokku reviews summary snippet.

1 cited community source. Small inspected sample: one vendor migration guide, one search-result G2 summary, and official plugin docs. Counts are not a satisfaction or prevalence measure. No original Reddit report was accessible within budget, so no exact user quotations are included and wider forum experience remains a recorded gap.

Love-it-or-hate-it verdict The migration guide concludes teams either love Dokku or hate it, with the split tracing directly to whether they enjoy managing their own host.[1]

Heroku-exit cost warning The same guide warns that some teams report roughly ten times their Heroku spend after scaling pains elsewhere, which frames Dokku as the control-first answer for small, steady workloads.[1]

Deployment and fit

Self-host or Pro on same servers Run the free core on your own Ubuntu or Debian server with Docker, or add Dokku Pro when you want the web UI and team controls on those same servers.[1][2]

Docker-based single-host ops Everything runs in Docker on hosts you administer, so operators should be comfortable with containers, domains, certificates, and scheduled backups.[1][2]

Questions worth asking

What is the best Dokku alternative for non-technical users?

If command-line server work is the blocker, Dokku Pro adds the web UI and role-based access from $200 per year, but the servers stay yours. If even that feels heavy, a fully managed platform may fit better, though that choice was not separately researched.[1]

Is Dokku really no-code?

Day-to-day deploys are git-push driven with no dashboard required, which suits developers but not non-technical users. Running the platform itself is administrator work: you provision the server, install Dokku, and operate plugins. Dokku Pro adds a web UI for teams that want clicks instead of CLI.[1][2]

How much does Dokku cost per month?

The self-hosted open-source edition is free on your own server; you still pay for the VPS, domains, and any external services. Dokku Pro Team starts at $200 per year for UI, previews, and RBAC on unlimited servers and apps, while Dokku Pro Scale is price on request. Recheck current pricing before deciding, as plans change.[1][2]

Can you self-host Dokku?

Yes. Dokku installs on your own Ubuntu or Debian server with Docker and runs the full platform there, including apps, datastores, domains, and backups. Dokku Pro is the alternative when you want a supported web UI and team controls on those same servers.[1][2]

Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

Evidence inspected October 2026: official Dokku homepage and plugin docs, the Dokku Pro page, one Qovery Heroku-migration guide covering Dokku, and the G2 Dokku reviews summary snippet. Small inspected sample: one vendor migration guide, one search-result G2 summary, and official plugin docs. Counts are not a satisfaction or prevalence measure. No original Reddit report was accessible within budget, so no exact user quotations are included and wider forum experience remains a recorded gap.

  1. Dokku homepage

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official homepage: Dokku as the smallest PaaS implementation, a Docker-powered mini-Heroku; push code with git; single documented CLI for apps, plugins, and datastores.

  2. Dokku plugin documentation

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official plugin docs: first-party plugins for Postgres, MySQL, Redis and more with backup-export and backup-import; storage plugin with S3-style auth and scheduled backups; domains plugin with LetsEncrypt; checks with retries, timeouts, and waits.

  3. Dokku Pro

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official Pro page: Pro Team from $200 per year for UI, previews, cron, OpenSearch logs, and RBAC on unlimited servers and apps; Pro Scale price on request; self-managed Pro on customer servers.

  4. Leaving Heroku With Your Procfile Intact

    community · Observed October 9, 2026

    Vendor migration guide: Dokku as single-host mini-Heroku from git push with buildpacks or Dockerfiles; love-it-or-hate-it verdict tied to host management; reported roughly 10x Heroku costs after scaling pains elsewhere; managed alternatives listed.

Compared with these products

No explicit proprietary baseline is recorded.

Similar projects

Related projects with shared categories, technologies, or licensing.

Coolify

CoolifyOpen

Deploy applications to your own servers with one click

Stars48.9K
Commit8h ago
LicenseApache-2.0

Coolify is a deployment platform that runs on servers you already pay for. It builds from a Git repository, provisions databases, issues certificates, and handles rollbacks, without the per-instance pricing of a hosted platform.

Dokploy

Dokploy

Self-hostable deployment platform for apps and databases

Stars37.6K
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0 + Dokploy Source Available License (DSAL-1.0)

Dokploy is a self-hostable platform for deploying applications and databases to servers you control, with Docker builds, managed TLS, and backups.

Dyrector

DyrectorOpen

Self-hosted platform for versioned container releases

Stars1,850
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0

Dyrector is a self-hosted continuous delivery platform that ships versioned container releases to Docker and Kubernetes nodes from one dashboard.

Temps

TempsOpen

Self-hosted PaaS with deploys, analytics, and error tracking

Stars837
Commitjust now
LicenseApache-2.0

Temps is a self-hosted deployment platform in one Rust binary with git-push deploys plus analytics, error tracking, uptime checks, email, and AI sandboxes.

Stormkit

Stormkit

Self-hostable platform for deploying and scaling web apps

Stars266
Commitjust now
LicenseAGPL-3.0-only

Stormkit is a self-hostable application platform that deploys web apps from Git with previews, domains, a database, auth, and analytics.

NHost

NHostOpen

Open-source backend with Postgres, GraphQL, auth, and storage

Stars9,351
Commitjust now
LicenseMIT

Nhost is an open-source backend platform on PostgreSQL that generates a GraphQL API from the database schema and bundles authentication, file storage, and serverless functions, offered as a managed cloud or as Docker self-hosting.