Skip to main content
OpenSourceAlternatives

Zapier alternatives

7 projects to consider for your Zapier workflows.

1 license unverified · 4 open source · 1 custom license · 1 source-available

Explore n8n, ActivePieces and Agenta. Each takes a different approach to your Zapier workflows. Read its capabilities and limitations to find the right fit.

Catalogue facts checked August 31, 2026

New

n8n

Visual workflow automation with room to drop into code

License unverifiedUnknownSelf-hosted

Technical teams that want automation and AI agents on infrastructure they control will get the most from n8n. Its visual canvas covers everyday integrations, and any step can drop into JavaScript or Python when the visual version runs out of room. The price of that control is operational responsibility, so non-technical teams that want a managed builder with the widest app coverage should look at Zapier instead. If you can run one service and you want agent loops without per-step billing, choose n8n; if you want zero infrastructure and a builder designed for non-technical users, choose Zapier.[1][2][3][4]

Good fit. Engineering-led teams automating internal work: code steps, Git version control, and environments fit teams that already review and deploy software.[1][2][3]

Keep in mind. Non-technical teams with no one to run a service: self-hosting needs updates, backups, and Postgres for production, and expression syntax takes study.[1][2][3]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed August 31, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 6, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

One detailed October 2026 DEV comparison post by stimlau, one anonymous May 2025 Slashdot user review (positive and negative fields quoted as labelled excerpts totalling 19 words), and one scored third-party review used for cross-checking. Purposive sample of three inspected reports, not a prevalence estimate. Reddit threads could not be inspected because Reddit blocked automated reading. The Slashdot review dates from May 2025 and may not describe the current release. Vendor-published case studies were excluded from independent reports.

  1. n8n pricing

    official · Observed October 6, 2026

    Official pricing page: plan structure, 17 percent annual saving, AI Assistant credits per tier, Agents/MCP/AI nodes in all plans, Business and Enterprise feature split. Euro figures did not render; amounts cross-checked in two 2026 analyses.

  2. Choose how to use n8n

    official · Observed October 6, 2026

    Official deployment guide: Cloud versus self-hosted, Community free indefinitely, Registered Community extras, paid Business and Enterprise self-hosted tiers with SSO, LDAP, roles, multi-main, log streaming, external secrets.

  3. n8n pricing in 2026: every plan and the execution math

    published measurement · Observed October 6, 2026 · Published September 9, 2026

    Pricing analysis updated September 10 2026: full plan table, execution billing model, overages, startup program, Frankfurt hosting, Berlin HQ; vendor case study referenced but not counted as independent evidence.

  4. n8n vs Zapier in 2026: Self-Hosted Power or Cloud Convenience?

    community · Observed October 6, 2026 · Published October 4, 2026

    DEV comparison post by stimlau with prices checked October 4 2026: node counts, code nodes, AI Agent and MCP nodes, human approval, queue mode, conditional n8n-versus-Zapier verdict quoted as a 15-word excerpt.

  5. n8n Reviews - 2026

    community · Observed October 6, 2026 · Published May 9, 2025

    Anonymous Slashdot user review from May 2025: drag-and-drop accessibility praised, beginner learning curve reported; positive and negative fields quoted as labelled excerpts totalling 19 words. Observed over http; https is the reader-safe locator.

  6. n8n Review 2026: Pricing, Pros and Cons

    community · Observed October 6, 2026

    Scored third-party review read in 2026 (8.6/10; no publication date shown): templates, Postgres and encryption-key operations guidance, queue mode, approval steps, price-gap analysis; its Apache 2.0 license claim was rejected against the official license text.

ActivePieces

Open-source AI automation platform with agents, flows, and 760+ app integrations

Open sourceMITSelf-hostedManaged hosting

Small teams automating operations without surrendering to per-task SaaS pricing will get the most from ActivePieces. Its visual flow builder plus AI agents and built-in tables covers the standard automation workload, and the MIT core self-hosts on Docker or Kubernetes. The material constraint is credit-metered usage with connector gaps against larger catalogues, so catalogue depth should be verified app by app. If you have mixed operator and builder needs and can self-host or budget credits, choose ActivePieces; if you need the largest ready-made app catalogue with zero operations, choose Zapier.[1][2]

Good fit. No-code teams wanting open source: visual building with approvals and tables serves operators directly without vendor lock-in.[1]

Keep in mind. Teams with catalogue-sensitive stacks: inspected reports find some connectors limited or manual versus larger catalogues.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 3, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 7, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

Three inspected G2 pros/cons reports: Matteo R. (January 22, 2026, 50+ active flows), Anton S. (connector depth), and Amit A. (catalogue comparison with Zapier). Two labelled excerpts totalling 20 words quoted exactly; full reviews linked in the readable draft. Small-business-heavy G2 sample; versions unstated on two reports; enterprise and self-hosting experiences underrepresented.

  1. ActivePieces pricing (official)

    official · Observed October 7, 2026

    Official pricing: tier/credit/feature matrix, plan gates, overage blocks, MIT self-host FAQ, 1000-credits-per-task definition.

  2. ActivePieces G2 pros and cons (community)

    community · Observed October 7, 2026

    G2 pros/cons sample: Matteo R. Jan 2026 positive report, Anton S. connector-depth report, Amit A. catalogue comparison.

Agenta

Open-source workspace for building and running AI agents

Open sourceMITSelf-hostedManaged hosting

Small teams that live in chat and want scheduled agents without building their own harness will get the most from Agenta. Its chat-first builder, multi-channel delivery, and approval gates cover the everyday automation need in one shared workspace. Teams that need proven enterprise governance or a large public track record of user reviews should look elsewhere for now. If your work is mostly deterministic step-by-step pipelines rather than conversational agents, choose a workflow orchestrator like n8n; if it is conversational teamwork with guardrails, Agenta is worth a closer look.[1][2]

Good fit. Groups that coordinate in Slack or WhatsApp can meet agents where they already talk, without teaching everyone a new interface. The shared workspace keeps agents, files, and run history in one place the whole team can open.[1][2]

Keep in mind. SSO, roles, and audit depth beyond the basics are gated or enterprise-scoped, and the 2.0 platform is newly rebuilt rather than long proven.[1][2]

Repository review signals: visibility change, fork change, unknown status, license change, very stale · Observed October 2, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 7, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. Introducing Agenta 2.0 - Agenta Blog

    official · Observed October 7, 2026

    Official 2.0 announcement: workspace positioning, channels, automations, harnesses, models, connectors, approvals, Coffee services, shuttered pricing with grandfathering. Read October 7, 2026; 2,360 Brave reviews noted as vendor claim, not used as evidence.

  2. Agenta-AI/agenta README

    official · Observed October 7, 2026

    Official repository README: definition, channels, automations, multiplayer, permissions, approvals, sandbox, tracing with cost, MIT licence, self-hosting, 30-plus models plus subscription use, memory/skills, agent teams, 1,000-plus apps via Composio, vendor comparisons. Read October 7, 2026. Star count 4,804 taken from catalogue snapshot, not this page.

Automa

No-code browser extension that automates repetitive web tasks

Custom licenseAGPL + Automa Commercial License

People doing repetitive work in Chrome or Firefox will get the most from Automa: free block-built workflows with scheduling, cron, scraping to Sheets, and API calls cover the chores that live in browser tabs. A November 2025 hands-on report confirms the payoff on real reporting tasks and names the ceiling honestly: strict bot detection and heavy-duty scraping are out of scope. When the work lives between server-side apps instead of inside pages, n8n or Zapier is the better fit.[1][2][3][4]

Good fit. People drowning in repetitive browser chores: if the day is the same clicks, fills, and checks, building the routine once from blocks pays back immediately, with scheduling and cron for the recurring ones.[1][2][3]

Keep in mind. Anyone fighting bot detection or scraping at scale: the November 2025 hands-on report names this directly, since strict bot protection and heavy-duty scraping sit outside what a browser extension can fairly do.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 3, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 7, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

One named firsthand report: Afam's November 2025 MakeUseOf staff account of automating daily reporting, scraping Google results into spreadsheets, and cutting a 40-minute tab-hopping dashboard task to minutes. Two labelled excerpts totalling 48 words are quoted exactly; the full report is linked in the readable draft. Purposive sample of one inspected firsthand staff report plus official documentation, not a prevalence estimate. The reporter automates reporting and tracking tasks in Chrome; Firefox-only, team, and long-term maintenance experiences are not represented. No Reddit or G2 firsthand report was inspectable for this revision.

  1. Automa extension page: automate your browser by connecting blocks

    official · Observed October 3, 2026

    Official extension landing page: block-connection automation, form fill, screenshots, scraping, JSON/CSV/Sheets export, marketplace, Chrome install.

  2. Automa documentation home

    official · Observed October 3, 2026

    Docs home: low-code/no-code positioning; Chrome and Firefox only, installed from official stores.

  3. Automa trigger block reference

    official · Observed October 3, 2026

    Trigger reference: the nine documented trigger types.

  4. This under-the-radar Chrome extension saved me hours of work (MakeUseOf)

    community · Observed October 7, 2026 · Published November 16, 2025

    Inspected firsthand staff report: daily reporting automation, Sheets scraping, 40-minute task to minutes, Pro plan exists, bot-detection limits.

Automatisch

Self-hosted workflow automation that keeps business data on your own servers

Open sourceAGPL-3.0Self-hosted

Small teams that want Zapier-style automation on infrastructure they control will get the most from Automatisch. Its no-code canvas covers everyday multi-app flows, and self-hosting keeps workflow data on your own servers at infrastructure cost only. The price is patience and narrower coverage, so teams needing instant triggers or thousands of apps should look at Zapier instead. If you can run one Compose stack and 15-minute polling is fast enough, choose Automatisch; if you want zero infrastructure and instant triggers, choose Zapier.[1][2][3][4]

Good fit. Privacy-conscious small teams automating everyday work: a non-technical reviewer had a working container despite no coding background.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Teams needing instant triggers: scheduled flows poll at intervals of 15 minutes or more, so time-sensitive automations will feel sluggish.[1][2]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 3, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 7, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

One firsthand June 2025 XDA setup review by Megan Ellis (quoted as labelled excerpts), one July 2025 third-party technical review, and one December 2022 TechPP roundup note used for cross-checking. Purposive sample of three inspected third-party reports, not a prevalence estimate. The XDA firsthand review dates from June 2025 and may not describe the current release. No Reddit or G2 original reports were found in the bounded search; vendor-published material was excluded from independent reports.

  1. Automatisch documentation

    official · Observed October 7, 2026

    Official Automatisch documentation: business automation positioning, no-programming flow building, continuous scheduled runs, self-hosted data residency, GDPR framing, and no vendor lock-in.

  2. Automatisch GitHub repository

    official · Observed October 7, 2026

    Official GitHub repository automatisch/automatisch: 13,993 stars and 4,776 commits observed October 2026, created September 2021, topics, Docker Compose deploy, CE AGPL-3.0 versus EE commercial split.

  3. Automatisch: The Open-Source Zapier Alternative That Puts You in Control

    community · Observed October 7, 2026

    Third-party technical review read October 2026: trigger/action model, polling versus webhooks, retries and rate limits, REST/GraphQL APIs, Docker Compose on Postgres and Redis, 100+ connectors, TypeScript connector packages, CE/EE license and SSO split.

  4. This free, self-hosted Zapier alternative is fantastic

    community · Observed October 7, 2026 · Published June 15, 2025

    Firsthand June 2025 XDA setup review by Megan Ellis: non-technical container setup, built-in Scheduler/Delay/Filter tools, 15-minute polling limitation, broken-flow and Google-integration rough edges; quoted as labelled excerpts.

  5. 7 Best Zapier Alternatives: Cheaper and Better

    community · Observed October 7, 2026 · Published December 13, 2022

    December 2022 TechPP alternatives roundup note: Automatisch described as relatively new with fewer integrations but GDPR compliant and self-hostable; quoted as a labelled excerpt.

ByteChef

Open-source AI agents and workflow automation you can self-host

Open sourceApache-2.0Self-hostedManaged hosting

Teams that need Zapier-style automation inside infrastructure they control benefit most from ByteChef. Durable execution with human-in-the-loop approvals, connectors that double as agent and MCP tools, and code steps in four languages carry that recommendation. The material constraint is accessibility: visual building still assumes developer help, exact monthly prices are not public, and SSO is still in development, so pure business teams should choose something else. If you have developers and self-hosting matters, choose ByteChef; if you need managed no-code simplicity, choose Zapier.[1][2][3]

Good fit. Platform teams automating across dozens of SaaS apps and databases fit best: the connector library plus code escape hatches serve mixed visual-and-code builders without leaving one surface.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Pure no-code business teams should avoid it: real workflows still need scripts, data mapping, and moderate deployment effort, and Copilot assistance is plan-gated, so a team with no developers will feel the gap.[1]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 3, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

One inspected Medium impression by @kresimircoko comparing ByteChef's UI favourably with n8n from what they had gathered. Vendor-published homepage quotes from InterCapital and Qubinets are noted in the community section as non-independent. A single thin impression, not a prevalence estimate. No Reddit or G2 original reports were accessible in bounded research; vendor-published homepage quotes are vendor-selected and not independent. No version, workflow, or deployment detail backs the UI impression.

  1. ByteChef: Open-Source Zapier Alternative

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official homepage: positioning, 250+ integrations, durable execution, code steps, flow controls, workflows-as-APIs, Git environments, embedded, Copilot, Enterprise boundaries, SSO in development, self-hosting runtimes, support channels. Observed 2026-10-09.

  2. ByteChef Pricing FAQ (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official pricing FAQ: Automation vs Embedded lines, Starter/Growth/Enterprise tiers, usage-based billing on tasks or AI credits plus users, overage in arrears, trials, 14-day guarantee. No dollar figures visible as read. Observed 2026-10-09.

  3. ByteChef repository README (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official README: Apache 2.0, 270+ components, durable execution, comparison table vs n8n/Zapier/Make, Docker quickstart, MCP support. Observed 2026-10-09.

  4. ByteChef UI impression (Medium comment)

    community · Observed October 9, 2026

    Single thin impression: title-only post saying ByteChef's UI seems more intuitive than n8n from what the author gathered. No tested comparison or detail. Observed 2026-10-09.

CodeZero

Visual no-code platform for building automations, integrations, and backends.

Source-availableCustom non-commercial source-available licenseSelf-hostedManaged hosting

Small teams that want visual, AI-assisted automation with self-host control get the most from CodeZero: describe a flow in words or start from a template, refine it on the canvas with your own provider model key, and run it in the cloud, from Docker Compose, or hybrid. The decisive constraint is licensing plus maturity: free use is personal and non-commercial only with a paid Enterprise Edition for commercial work, and the canary-stage ecosystem is smaller than n8n or Zapier, so confirm license terms and integration coverage before committing.[1][2][3]

Good fit. Small teams wiring two services together or exposing a light backend endpoint without writing boilerplate.[1][2]

Keep in mind. Teams assuming OSI-approved open source: the LICENSE grants personal, non-commercial use only and requires a paid Enterprise Edition license for commercial use.[1][2]

Repository review signals: unknown status, very stale · Observed October 3, 2026.

Read project review Official website
Sources and editorial review

Source research. Reviewed on October 9, 2026. Written by Sanjib Sah. AI assisted; reviewed by a human editor.

We have not run or tested this product.

  1. CodeZero official site (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official homepage: no-code automation and AI orchestration positioning, AI flow generation, self-host and hybrid runtimes, GLS partnership, vendor throughput claims versus n8n.

  2. CodeZero repository README (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Official repository README: visual flow canvas, AI building with bring-your-own OpenAI/OpenRouter-compatible model, webhook and cron triggers, HTTP endpoints, MCP tools, Action SDK, organizations and roles, self-host and hybrid deployment.

  3. CodeZero LICENSE (official)

    official · Observed October 9, 2026

    Repository LICENSE: personal non-commercial use only; commercial or professional use requires a paid Code0 Enterprise Edition license per user seat.

Compare Zapier alternatives

Known catalogue facts at a glance. Columns with no reviewed values are omitted. “Not reviewed” means unknown, not that a capability is absent.

Known facts for Zapier alternatives
ProjectLicense policyHostingDeploymentOfflineEnterprise supportBest fit
n8nUnknown · unverifiedSelf-hostedNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewedNot reviewed
ActivePiecesMIT · OSI-approvedSelf-hosted + ManagedeasyNot reviewedYesAutomating multi-app business workflows; Building AI agents over company tools
AgentaMIT · OSI-approvedSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedYesTeams building chat-defined agents for repeated knowledge and operations work; Operators running scheduled or event-triggered background agents with approvals
AutomaAGPL + Automa Commercial License · customNo supported option recordedeasyYesNot reviewedAutomating repetitive browser tasks without writing code; Scraping website data into JSON, CSV, or sheets
AutomatischAGPL-3.0 · OSI-approvedSelf-hostedeasyNot reviewedNot reviewedAutomating multi-app business workflows; Teams that must keep workflow data on their own servers
ByteChefApache-2.0 · OSI-approvedSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedNot reviewedBusiness process automation; SaaS application integration
CodeZeroCustom non-commercial source-available license · source-availableSelf-hosted + ManagedmoderateNot reviewedNot reviewedWorkflow automation; Integration backends

Before you switch

  • Check that the project covers the workflows and data you need to move.
  • Confirm that the license terms fit how you plan to run, modify, and distribute it.
  • Choose between self-hosting responsibility and a reviewed managed option.
  • Open the project page for repository freshness, review dates, and any unresolved requirements.
About Zapier

Zapier's moat is the integration catalogue. Almost anything with an API is already connected, maintained by someone else, and works without a developer, which is worth a great deal to teams with no engineering capacity to spare.

Pricing is per task executed, so cost scales with volume rather than with value. High volume workflows are usually the first thing teams move somewhere else.

Zapier · Free for 100 tasks/month, paid from $19.99/month · Checked August 31, 2026

Official website
How this list is ordered

Recommended · Organic catalogue order.

A deterministic editorial score using relationship confidence, category fit, logarithmic popularity, as-of maintenance and freshness, with bounded anomaly quarantine and known-data penalties. Payment is fixed at zero.

Payment does not affect organic ranking. Order is a starting point, not a universal recommendation.

OpenAlternative organic alternatives v4 · version 4